History SI Oui Eat humans in Thailand
Man eating people or social victim?
The SI Oui picture is a persistent image of people. The newspapers deliberately seem to chew. Show the cruelty of Zu This image makes SI Oui becomes a symbol of human cruelty.
SI Oui case man eating man and serial killer A famous historical case Horrified to the Thai society 45 years ago by the brutal killing of seven bodies in the next five years, between the years 1954 to 1958, which was arrested while trying to burn the last funeral in Rayong. The investigation has extended the results to the brutal behavior in the same six other cases. The case ended at the Court of Appeal. With the death penalty From the last case only one case. But the stigma of CS is based on the judgment of society. The savage man killed 7 atrocities under a certain clue in the investigation process. The suspicion that Cui is actually a serial killer. Or the victims of society.
Rancor And the violence of the case. Social ignorance to examine the "details" of the formal statement. And interviews in the newspaper. The only thing that society wants is. This is my first post.
The key issue of this case is the statement, which is the confession of the accused. Does not match the facts in the substance of the case. The first day of the investigation was 96 hours. The next day, two more pleaded guilty. The other nine days later, four others pleaded guilty, while the investigating officer said that they had done the right thing. confess But why is it wrong? Especially at the heart of the case. Is handling the victim's organs? No wonder that Cui has never tasted the taste of liver and heart as it appears in Confessions. Or news in the newspaper This is an important issue to solve.
Rancor And the violence of the case. Social ignorance to examine the "details" of the formal statement. And interviews in the newspaper. The only thing that society wants is. This is my first post.
The key issue of this case is the statement, which is the confession of the accused. Does not match the facts in the substance of the case. The first day of the investigation was 96 hours. The next day, two more pleaded guilty. The other nine days later, four others pleaded guilty, while the investigating officer said that they had done the right thing. confess But why is it wrong? Especially at the heart of the case. Is handling the victim's organs? No wonder that Cui has never tasted the taste of liver and heart as it appears in Confessions. Or news in the newspaper This is an important issue to solve.
Life History SI Oui
SI Oui was born around 1921 in Hunan, Shantou Province, China. His father is Mr. Hui. His mother is Chow. But the data from the daily newspaper said. In the village of Luang Tai, in Hong Kong, the province is home to four young people of Chinese descent.When I was a teenager, I was enlisted to a military unit in Gyeongju. In the war between China and Japan After the war, peace. I was tempted to fight with the Maui Tung. Before leaving the military in Thailand on December 28, 1946 by the name of the ship.
When SI Oui landed in Thailand I was detained at the Immigration Bureau for 10 days before Mr. Tin Ki Sae Ung to be certified. (There is another interview that claims that. He is a money issuer to make a foreign passport and enter the city), then stay in the city of Tianjin at the Tianjin Hotel. 5-6 days before going to Thasaka. Prachuap Khiri Khan Province According to the testimony of January 30, 1958, "Thais live in Thailand for the first time in Thap Sakae District. Prachuap Khiri Khan"
Then SI Oui went to work on several jobs. No address And it is difficult to rank because each statement SI Oui. And each of that is a short period of 6 months, some 2 months, some 8 months, depending on the job that is employed.
In the first 8 years in Thailand, SI Oui did not commit any serious crime. Sometimes the brawl is sometimes. But the clue is important. SI routes and shelters Oui in the latter At the scene of the 7 amazing cases are Prachuap Khiri Khan 4 cases Bangkok, Nakhon Pathom and Rayong 1 case.
The beginning of the legend SI Oui
SI Oui has narrated the events in the last case before being arrested. On January 30, 1958, it was reported that January 27, 2501, at about 3-4 o'clock, while SI Oui was watering the vegetables in the garden of Mr. Idy Ched, Nong Phra Sub-District, Muang District, Rayong Province. Boonyakan walks in for a purchase of vegetables with SIU 1 SI. Oui then plots to catch birds in the rubber plantations. The son of Somchai agreed to do it well.SI Oui took the child through the house. Then pick up the knife for the buffalo. Which plugged in with the lid. The pair went into the rubber plantation. From the house to the east about 40 steps, Somchai boy began to resist the SI refused. Oui used both hands to hold the child around 40 steps, leaving the stand.
At that moment, the boy did not cry or struggled to resist SI Oui. Lie down Then use the left hand gag and nose. SI Oui began to use the knife from the navel to the bronchi. Then cut the heart and liver out to pile on the leaves. Then the baby's body was moved to hide. The heart and liver. Bring back home Put the basin in the pantry. To keep to eat
Wait until the dark SI Oui to take the child to lay. Find the wood chips. To burn the evidence. In this way, Mr. Navara Boonyakarn, the father of the son of Somboon Which came out to the son who lost from the afternoon. At the scene, Navajo Bunyakan showed SI Oui, who was about to drop a dry branch on a wooden stool. Mr. Nava and Mr.Songiam Muangsang to catch the SI Oui tie to the people to report.
The statement states that during the arrest No Resistance Which match the Court of First Instance "I did not fight and no weapons. And the knife that I was attacking my child on the lid of the house. "(Judgment of the Court of Appeal: witnesses promptly track. The defendant also draws the knife. The fight will be hit and bundled.)
When the authorities arrive at the scene. The body was stabbed in the neck. And the cut from the navel to chest up to the neck. Then find out the house of SI Oui found heart with liver live. Put the basin in the pantry.
The arrest was negligible. SI Oui is not resistant to placing the knife on the lid of the house. When Zuoi was caught in the wild. Witness the object Investigation of the case "Human Eating" has started since then.
2 more dead
When this Rayong case. Complete The prosecutor wanted to expand the case to a similar murder scenario. Both the inquiry and the newspaper. I think that this case of Rayong is similar to murder two other cases have occurred. The case was murdered at Chitralada Station on November 28, 1954, and the murder case at Chedi Chedi on February 5, 1957 led the investigation into the two cases at the same time.The social and media. Especially the newspaper The point and point to the brutal murder of two cases seriously. This leads to SI Oui's "more" confession that he is the one who committed the two cases.
Confucius's confession appears in the current record. There are three versions, the statements of January 30, January 31 and February 5, 1958. All copies are available at the Thai Prosecutor's Museum. And appeared as an interview of the daily newspaper of that time, published several consecutive.
Notable is the interrogation and news in the newspaper. Concentrate on the issue to "summarize" SI Oui as a defendant in all cases before entering the court process. The statements and interviews in the newspapers appear to have "significant points" that contradict the facts.
Notable is the interrogation and news in the newspaper. Concentrate on the issue to "summarize" SI Oui as a defendant in all cases before entering the court process. The statements and interviews in the newspapers appear to have "significant points" that contradict the facts.
Check out the first testimonial notes.
When SI Oui was arrested in the case of Somboon Boys (Rayong), the case was linked to two other cases, the murder of Chitralada Park Railway Station (Bangkok) and the murders at Chedi Chedi (Nakhon Pathom). There is a form of murder in the same way. And the victim is the same child.SI Oui was arrested on the night of January 27, 2501. The testimony was recorded on January 30. The investigation and record of the testimony were interpreted by SI Oui. "The content of the 30-day memorandum has three major issues: the denied case in Bangkok. Denial of the case at Nakhon Pathom And the confession in Rayong. As mentioned in the beginning.
For Bangkok lawsuit And the case at Nakhon Pathom SI Oui denied that it was involved. I agree that Rayong is the first offense. "... and never kill a man to take his liver and heart to eat."
About the case in Bangkok, SI Oui admits that knowing But not to see.
"... in Bangkok, I have heard people say that someone killed a kid and brain about a year, then I was in the province of Phranakhon. "I was not going to see him," and SI Oui also denied this record. "To kill this kid, I do not hurt anyone, I do not know ..."
Just like the case in Nakhon Pathom SI Oui was in the same accident. But not to see the event.
"In the murder of children and the Nakhon Pathom is the same news. At that time in Nakhon Pathom province I stayed in Nakhon Pathom for one night ... "and SI Oui declined in this case just like in Bangkok. "Hear the locals speak. I do not want to see the train waiting to return to Thad Sakae. But who will kill me, I do not know ... "
Record the testimony in this first issue. It shows that the investigators wanted to link the three cases together, which SI Oui declined.
This is a preliminary observation. The newspaper, dated January 31, broadcasts SI Oui interview, which will be interviewed before 31st. Sorting takes time. Assumed to be interviewed on the 30th day with the first testimony because SI Oui also declined.
SI interview Oui in the newspaper does not match the testimony record. The case in Bangkok is to see the scene. Just like the case in Nakhon Pathom. I went to look but could not find the child. On the same day, the investigating officer notices both events. Why are the facts wrong in the same day?
Not just this After investigating for 4 days, SI Oui confesses that he is the man who handled the three cases. The confession is still not true.
This is a preliminary observation. The newspaper, dated January 31, broadcasts SI Oui interview, which will be interviewed before 31st. Sorting takes time. Assumed to be interviewed on the 30th day with the first testimony because SI Oui also declined.
SI interview Oui in the newspaper does not match the testimony record. The case in Bangkok is to see the scene. Just like the case in Nakhon Pathom. I went to look but could not find the child. On the same day, the investigating officer notices both events. Why are the facts wrong in the same day?
Not just this After investigating for 4 days, SI Oui confesses that he is the man who handled the three cases. The confession is still not true.
Change statement
SI Oui has been arrested since the night of January 27th, until the 30th. Finally, over 96 hours, the evening of 31 January at 19:15 SI Oui changed the statement. The confession in Bangkok and the case of Nakhon Pathom was detailed by the investigating officer as evidence."I killed a man. And take the heart and liver to eat two people in Bangkok and one in Nakhon Pathom "
It may be normal for a villain to deny it. When he got into the exam, he finally accepted the confession. But the problem of these two cases lies in the confession of SI. Oui does not match the facts. This is because SI Oui deliberately lied or could not remember or did not know about it?
The testimony killed atrocities. At Chitralada Railway Station
The killings at Chitralada Park Railway Station in Bangkok The victim was a 5-year-old girl, Li Juei, who was killed on the night of November 28, 1954. The victim was a daughter in the Xieng Gong district after Odeon Cinema. I'm going to go to the cinema and disappear. The body was found by workers at Chitralada Railway Station on the morning of the 29th. No evidence found. To point out the villains, except footprints "bloody feet" pecking on the floor.
This event was silent for three years until the arrest of SI Oui and the case was finally brought together. SI Oui then confessed the case. According to a memorandum dated January 31, 1958, at 19.15 am after being detained for 96 hours, SI Oui described the murders in detail.
"... at 8 o'clock in the night, I left home alone to watch the scene at the shrine near Hua Lamphong while watching the girl find a girl crying beside the theater ..."
SI Oui went to comfort her. I will take it home. The girl agrees. I also complained that Syaoran Ooi took the child to walk.
This event was silent for three years until the arrest of SI Oui and the case was finally brought together. SI Oui then confessed the case. According to a memorandum dated January 31, 1958, at 19.15 am after being detained for 96 hours, SI Oui described the murders in detail.
"... at 8 o'clock in the night, I left home alone to watch the scene at the shrine near Hua Lamphong while watching the girl find a girl crying beside the theater ..."
SI Oui went to comfort her. I will take it home. The girl agrees. I also complained that Syaoran Ooi took the child to walk.
"... I was carrying through the MRT station. And then left the street. Then cross the bridge King battle. Then went to the intersection of Mahanak and White Bridge. Then walk along the Bangkok-Ayutthaya Railway. When I arrived, I did not know about 200-300 steps (4 lines) at the train station. I put the child down and wake up baby. By the way. And there is a canal next door. Pull up a 6-7 inch long knife, including the body and the handle, by pushing the baby down. Then use the left hand gag. Then use your right hand to pierce the throat beneath. There is another baby voice. Then the child wears a white shirt as a t-shirt. I use a knife to break the shirt. Then cut from the navel to the pharynx. By the way, Rayong. Then cut the heart and liver to half. Then cut the secret. The secret of throwing away. Then put on the pants. Then walk back to the hostel ... "
SI Oui left the dead body at the scene. Then walk back to the house, which is located with Mr. Yoo Sae Ngong near the chapel of Chai at around 23.00-24.00 hours, including operating time from carrying children to the body to walk back home not more than 3 hours?
"... When I came home, I saw that the house was still burning. Then put the liver and heart into the kettle and boil it when cooked, and then eat all that night ... "
This is part of the testimony. This is the SI. Oui must return to the details of the event three years ago, which the investigators have revealed. The investigation process is neat. Do not threaten any force.
"... There is no threat. Just say that. What are you talking about? SI Oui is openly confessing "
The investigators also believe that SI Oui is the same gang, the three cases are cases in Rayong. Lawsuit in bangkok And the case at Nakhon Pathom. "Straight not to ask, but SI Oui told himself and told the place was right ..."
"... When I came home, I saw that the house was still burning. Then put the liver and heart into the kettle and boil it when cooked, and then eat all that night ... "
This is part of the testimony. This is the SI. Oui must return to the details of the event three years ago, which the investigators have revealed. The investigation process is neat. Do not threaten any force.
"... There is no threat. Just say that. What are you talking about? SI Oui is openly confessing "
The investigators also believe that SI Oui is the same gang, the three cases are cases in Rayong. Lawsuit in bangkok And the case at Nakhon Pathom. "Straight not to ask, but SI Oui told himself and told the place was right ..."
The statement does not match the facts.
After SI Oui confesses in Bangkok lawsuit Daily newspaper, then it was fun news. SI Oui, known in the nickname "Human Eater" Killer, kill, eat, drink, drink, blood, fresh, eat the heart, the image is still follow SI Oui to this day
But when checked to the old newspaper three years ago, which reported after the incident. The news of the morning of November 30, 1954 also found a different profile. And find some information that "may" cause SI Oui must confess wrong.
Starting point SI Oui says that the baby's throat and cut the heart and liver. At the same time and point. No moving victims. But the news is pointing out the traces of the murder.
"... the authorities assumed. The cruel murderer would have caught her mother hit the edge of the rocks and then repeatedly stabbed and then carried the child's body to the wall of the station building. Then we managed to slice the apple and cut the 'machine in' and all the 'secret' to the "because it was found on the platform station. There are blood drops to the body, about 3 feet away.
But when checked to the old newspaper three years ago, which reported after the incident. The news of the morning of November 30, 1954 also found a different profile. And find some information that "may" cause SI Oui must confess wrong.
Starting point SI Oui says that the baby's throat and cut the heart and liver. At the same time and point. No moving victims. But the news is pointing out the traces of the murder.
"... the authorities assumed. The cruel murderer would have caught her mother hit the edge of the rocks and then repeatedly stabbed and then carried the child's body to the wall of the station building. Then we managed to slice the apple and cut the 'machine in' and all the 'secret' to the "because it was found on the platform station. There are blood drops to the body, about 3 feet away.
Another strange thing is that the investigator said "did not ask, but SI Oui told himself and told the location was correct", which actually SI Oui even moved at all times. It is the least used in Bangkok compared to other provinces. In particular, SI Oui came to Bangkok. Just 10 days before the accident, the name of the road, bridge and route was correctly identified. Throughout the record many statements. About the place of residence in the SI Oui case, it was pointed out that Cui may be in Bangkok. This time only If more than one time, it is a short time. Do not stay for a long time.
In addition, SI Oui also named the residents in Bangkok. In this case not the same. The first 30 days of the testimony that they have been in the house of Mr. Bouche Sae Li about 15 days to live about 10 days, so the news of murder. The 31st day of the statement said that it was with Mr. Iwoo Sue Ong about 10 days, so the case.
Bridging the road may be a "way" to record, or to identify a host to stay with, may be a mistake.
In addition, SI Oui also named the residents in Bangkok. In this case not the same. The first 30 days of the testimony that they have been in the house of Mr. Bouche Sae Li about 15 days to live about 10 days, so the news of murder. The 31st day of the statement said that it was with Mr. Iwoo Sue Ong about 10 days, so the case.
Bridging the road may be a "way" to record, or to identify a host to stay with, may be a mistake.
But the fact is. The killer does not cut the heart and liver of the victim. This organ remains with the body. The missing part is the victim's genitals only. Information that makes people believe that SI Oui cut the liver from the heart, then came out of the newspaper at that time, reported the error. I did not edit the news. Or news SI Oui case occurred, details of the case in Bangkok. In the newspaper dated February 30, 1954,
"... a Chinese girl about five years old was slashed by her daughter, who was missing, and was dislocated, heart, liver, and well, as well. The worse thing was that the" secret "was cut off as well."
Is it possible that the investigators and the newspaper will take this information as a set. Did this happen?
This error is also noted. Of the police who were responsible for the case. Which came out after the news coverage of SI Oui's confession, with an interview with the newspaper on February 4, 1958, which commented.
"... but I'm surprised that SI Oui said that after killing Li Junjou, he took heart - liver - kidney, put the kettle in the garden, The villain does not take anything but the secret.
"... a Chinese girl about five years old was slashed by her daughter, who was missing, and was dislocated, heart, liver, and well, as well. The worse thing was that the" secret "was cut off as well."
Is it possible that the investigators and the newspaper will take this information as a set. Did this happen?
This error is also noted. Of the police who were responsible for the case. Which came out after the news coverage of SI Oui's confession, with an interview with the newspaper on February 4, 1958, which commented.
"... but I'm surprised that SI Oui said that after killing Li Junjou, he took heart - liver - kidney, put the kettle in the garden, The villain does not take anything but the secret.
SI Oui did not take the heart of the victim put boiled kettle in the confession!
But for any reason. Several days later. SI's interview Oui newspaper, dated February 12, 1958, changed the "story" to match the facts.
"... When Li Junjun died, he dragged his body inside and used his knife to slit his chest. When he finished, he reached for his heart and lungs. He jumped out, but when he saw that it was too small, he was caught. And the sting of the esophagus in the neck. "
Why do "human eaters" who are willing to invest children carrying several kilometers. Hope to kill the liver with heart. It was just a "too small" view, despite the fact that the victims were between 5-10 years old.
This is a new case. Police investigations did not find any clues. "At the Chitralada Park. The officer did not have fingerprints at all. "And the silent case disappears over 3 years, so the case can be summed up because of the false confession of the SI Oui sure enough.
However, this case did not go to court. The punishment of the CSI ended in front of newspapers and the judgment of the society.
But for any reason. Several days later. SI's interview Oui newspaper, dated February 12, 1958, changed the "story" to match the facts.
"... When Li Junjun died, he dragged his body inside and used his knife to slit his chest. When he finished, he reached for his heart and lungs. He jumped out, but when he saw that it was too small, he was caught. And the sting of the esophagus in the neck. "
Why do "human eaters" who are willing to invest children carrying several kilometers. Hope to kill the liver with heart. It was just a "too small" view, despite the fact that the victims were between 5-10 years old.
This is a new case. Police investigations did not find any clues. "At the Chitralada Park. The officer did not have fingerprints at all. "And the silent case disappears over 3 years, so the case can be summed up because of the false confession of the SI Oui sure enough.
However, this case did not go to court. The punishment of the CSI ended in front of newspapers and the judgment of the society.
Nakorn Pathom
case
The case took place on the night of February 5, 1957. The victim was a girl named Xiu Jue, aged 5, who pleaded guilty on January 31, 1958, as a confession recorded in a Bangkok case. This is the case in Nakhon Pathom. SI Oui meets a girl in Chinese New Year. It's a good idea to go to the ginkgo at the grocery store only 5k.
"... took this kid with both hands. Arrive at the temple, where there is a Chamchuri tree, then place the child and push it down. And with one hand gagged. The other hand is used with a sharp knife to pierce the throat. "
SI Oui then drags the child into the cave of Phra Pathom Chedi. Dissection
"... I carried the dead child into the temple. I will not be able to carry it. I had to put my body before I dragged the corpse into this channel to dissect the body and cut the liver and heart. I left my body there. "
This case appears to be more evidence than other cases. The murderer left at the scene.
"While I was doing this, I had to put on a bucket, but I left the buckets at the side of the temple, leaving them both. The flashlight left behind the tree. "
The important part of this case is the case in Bangkok, SI Oui said that he had cut the liver and his heart pocket pants back home. "... When I got home, Mr. Jinyou brother The fire is boiled using a kettle in the back. Then quickly eat "
Facts with testimony
Back to check the news on the day of the accident from the newspaper on February 6, 1957 found the confession. There are conflicting messages as well as the Bangkok lawsuit. It appears that the organs SI Oui claimed to cut out and bring back to eat at home. Actually still with the dead body itself.
"... It appears that the naked body. I was stabbed at the leash. And the wound from the nape of the front to the abdomen, almost to the genitals, both the heart and the bowels, burst out on the outside, near the corpse, there was a knife and bloody clothes on the headrest. "
According to the report, while the murderers were decapitated. The novices met. So hurry to escape before cutting the organs.
SI Oui did not bring his liver to heart to cook boiled pots as confessions as the case in Bangkok.
Two more important proofs are the flashlight and the spring. Although not present in the news. On January 31, 1958, the Nakorn Pathom City Sheriff's Office took part in the investigation. And asked for a flashlight with a bucket. Have been rejected
"... asked whether the Oui's shovels and flashlights were genuine, but SI Oui refused," but after only 3 hours on the same day. It appears SI's confession. Oui admits owning both pieces of evidence.
"... This killing has put on the buckwheat, but I left the buckwheat on the side of the temple. Both left. The flashlight left behind the tree. "
The investigator mentioned the evidence in this case. "The part where Nakhon Pathom. It's all about the fact that this case has no evidence of a murderer until SI Oui confesses to himself.
"... It appears that the naked body. I was stabbed at the leash. And the wound from the nape of the front to the abdomen, almost to the genitals, both the heart and the bowels, burst out on the outside, near the corpse, there was a knife and bloody clothes on the headrest. "
According to the report, while the murderers were decapitated. The novices met. So hurry to escape before cutting the organs.
SI Oui did not bring his liver to heart to cook boiled pots as confessions as the case in Bangkok.
Two more important proofs are the flashlight and the spring. Although not present in the news. On January 31, 1958, the Nakorn Pathom City Sheriff's Office took part in the investigation. And asked for a flashlight with a bucket. Have been rejected
"... asked whether the Oui's shovels and flashlights were genuine, but SI Oui refused," but after only 3 hours on the same day. It appears SI's confession. Oui admits owning both pieces of evidence.
"... This killing has put on the buckwheat, but I left the buckwheat on the side of the temple. Both left. The flashlight left behind the tree. "
The investigator mentioned the evidence in this case. "The part where Nakhon Pathom. It's all about the fact that this case has no evidence of a murderer until SI Oui confesses to himself.
3 lawsuits SI Oui Never taste the taste of liver and heart.
When the three cases were linked together, similar forms of murder resulted in the SI Oui becoming a "human being" immediately because of the confession, which indicated that it had been prepared. Rayong Case The "form" at SI Oui claims to have eaten the liver and heart. It is claimed that the same pattern is "put the kettle"SI Oui did not eat the liver with the victim's heart.
4 more plea
SI Oui would be heavily questioned. I have to confess that it is the act of killing 4 more bodies in Prachuap Khiri Khan. In the confession of SI Oui on February 5, 1958, it was found that four murder cases had different behaviors.The first incident occurred on April 10, 2497 at Tubsakae Prachuabkirikhan victims are the girl Barefoot Bare 8 years old, the villain uses a knife to pierce the throat.
"... The next morning I knew that the boy was But the truth is that the victim survived.
May 2, 1954, at Tesabaka, Prachuabkirikhan, the victims were 10-year-old Na Yoo Pho, the victim of a murderous incident similar to the three big cases: abdominal dissection, heart and liver transplant. "Put the kettle" before going back to eat in the room. Unfortunately, this case has no comparable data. There is only one confession. It is difficult to determine whether the "kettle" is real or false. In two cases at SI Oui "put kettle" has never actually done a single case.
The third incident occurred on June 20, 1954, Huay Saen village, Thap Sakae Prachuapkhirikhan. The victim was a 9 year old girl, Lim Saeng Sae. SI Oui said that using a folding knife bought a new victim.
"... As a folding knife, I bought a new one and stabbed my neck, and I fled to the same house. "I'm sorry," he said. The victim was slain, throat and rape, which rape victim is not the behavior of SI Oui.
The fourth incident occurred on October 27, 1954 in Muang District. Contact with Sam Roi Yot Pranburi Prachuap Khiri Khan, the victim is a girl named Song Sae Lee 10 years old.
"... use a knife to stab. Then cut a piece of neck and then left at the scene. "
Siu Oui case concluded that human eating or serial killings The fact that "suspicious" every case, even if the last case before being arrested in Rayong. It's called catching red-handed. The middle of the liver and heart. But the doctor's record, the witness of the funeral, returned the testimony. According to an autopsy report dated January 28, 1958, the day after SI Oui was arrested, experts had to verify whether the liver and heart were human organs.
"... has been verified. It appears that the heart and liver are actually human organs. It is recorded as evidence.
But save the testimony of the doctor who proved you the same. At the Rayong Provincial Court The witness requested to resolve the testimony record, as appeared at the end of the document of the Rayong Provincial Court, dated March 25, 2501. Black Case No. 145/2501
"... Prove to prove the record. Then yes, as stated. But let's solve the record that proved. Similar to the liver - human heart "
It is a matter of "technique" to provide to prevent mistakes. Witnesses generally use words like "similar" but medical at that time. I can not prove the DNA as it is today. But it can prove blood group as the boy's merit. While evidence is still alive on the day of the testimony, it is recorded as evidence that it is a human organ. But the witness not only does not identify the owner of the heart and liver. Choose to use the word. "Similar to the liver - the heart of man", so far away the truth away? Why?
The details of the fall, which are useful to the defendant in this case, such as the murderer using the knife with the same hand or not. Dissection, breaking up or fingerprints, offenses, etc. These things are essential if needed. All seven lawsuits are linked by the same person.
SI Oui did not take advantage of this error in the case because SI Oui did not object or fight the case. Even the interpreter has to go through the interpreter. It is just a listener. And accept the verdict. In the judgment, it appears that the word. "Defendant does not ask" or "defendant does not testify"
However, these doubts are not sufficient to point out that SI Oui was not a murderer in some cases. It was pointed out that throughout the investigation period, SI Oui had to fight the investigation process of the social newspaper and the court alone. I have to confess all the charges. The confession is based on facts and all 6 cases before the last case in Rayong. It is obvious that. No evidence to identify the killer.
The only fact that SI Oui is able to "defend" is that SI Oui has never tasted the taste of the liver and heart as it is.
Also good at SI Oui was sentenced to death. And the death penalty for life imprisonment in the Court of First Instance. But was sentenced to death in the Court of Appeal. Only the case of Somboon Boys in Rayong is just one case, and the other 6 cases, the newspaper and society have helped to judge it.
SI Oui was executed on September 16, 1959. On September 27, the same year, the University of Medicine (Siriraj) Oui came to study. To find the wrong man. It is stored in an anatomical building. Tsui's body is the principal to the medical students. Teach morals to society I do not even mention time to justice.
Present draft of SI Oui is still inside Siriraj Hospital. The Forensic Museum Building Aduldej Vikram Or commonly known. "SI Oui Museum"
The details of the fall, which are useful to the defendant in this case, such as the murderer using the knife with the same hand or not. Dissection, breaking up or fingerprints, offenses, etc. These things are essential if needed. All seven lawsuits are linked by the same person.
SI Oui did not take advantage of this error in the case because SI Oui did not object or fight the case. Even the interpreter has to go through the interpreter. It is just a listener. And accept the verdict. In the judgment, it appears that the word. "Defendant does not ask" or "defendant does not testify"
However, these doubts are not sufficient to point out that SI Oui was not a murderer in some cases. It was pointed out that throughout the investigation period, SI Oui had to fight the investigation process of the social newspaper and the court alone. I have to confess all the charges. The confession is based on facts and all 6 cases before the last case in Rayong. It is obvious that. No evidence to identify the killer.
The only fact that SI Oui is able to "defend" is that SI Oui has never tasted the taste of the liver and heart as it is.
Also good at SI Oui was sentenced to death. And the death penalty for life imprisonment in the Court of First Instance. But was sentenced to death in the Court of Appeal. Only the case of Somboon Boys in Rayong is just one case, and the other 6 cases, the newspaper and society have helped to judge it.
SI Oui was executed on September 16, 1959. On September 27, the same year, the University of Medicine (Siriraj) Oui came to study. To find the wrong man. It is stored in an anatomical building. Tsui's body is the principal to the medical students. Teach morals to society I do not even mention time to justice.
Present draft of SI Oui is still inside Siriraj Hospital. The Forensic Museum Building Aduldej Vikram Or commonly known. "SI Oui Museum"
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น